User talk:Wavepainter
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 19:16, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
File:Portrait of Valery Bryusov by Nina Niss-Goldman.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
De728631 (talk) 19:51, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
File:Memorial plaque for Russian ballet dancer Yekaterina Geltzer in Bryusov pereulok, Moscow.jpg
[edit]File:Memorial plaque for Russian ballet dancer Yekaterina Geltzer in Bryusov pereulok, Moscow.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Dogad75 (talk) 22:52, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Anry Volochnsky.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Anry Volochnsky.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 18:50, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
File:Oleg Yankovsky-2003.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Secondarywaltz (talk) 22:46, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
File:Екатерина Райкина-1964.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Secondarywaltz (talk) 22:47, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted content
[edit]
File:Екатерина Райкина-1964.jpg
- use in any work, regardless of content
- creation of derivative works
- commercial use
- free distribution
See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.
Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.Yours sincerely, Alan (talk) 00:11, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
I have done my best giving on the talk page quite a reasonable explanation why there is no any copyright violation. And now I'm not going to spend the rest of my life arguing with you. Thank you. Wavepainter (talk) 00:44, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
File:A.V.Pekarev A.F.Zhukov R.R.Kliks VDNKh (Russia) 1954.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Stolbovsky (talk) 14:21, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
File tagging File:Last Address Sign — Nurgali Ajpov.png
[edit]This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Last Address Sign — Nurgali Ajpov.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Dogad75 (talk) 04:07, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
File tagging File:Last Address Sign — Taip Saliahutdinov.png
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Last Address Sign — Taip Saliahutdinov.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Last Address Sign — Taip Saliahutdinov.png]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Dogad75 (talk) 04:08, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted content
[edit]
File:Last Address Sign — Taip Saliahutdinov.png
- use in any work, regardless of content
- creation of derivative works
- commercial use
- free distribution
See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.
Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.And also:
- File:Last Address Sign — Nurgali Ajpov.png
- File:A.VETLUGUIN.tif
- File:Gorodovikov in Kovrov. 1943.jpg
- File:Lieutenant-Colonel A.V.Pekarev leaves Port Arthur. Oct.1945.jpg
- File:A.V.Pekarev on a Horse. Kovrov, 1942.jpg
- File:Worker Sculptor A.V.Pekarev 1948.jpg
- File:Lenin sculptor Pekarev A.V. 1969.jpg
- File:Pekarev aleksandr vasilyevich at work.jpg
- File:Sculptor Pekarev A.V.-Predsedatel.1954.jpg
- File:Bikov V.R.-Sculptor Pekarev A.V.1948.jpg
- File:Главный архитектор Б. М. Иофан (второй слева) обсуждает проект здания МГУ с секретарём ЦК ВКП(б) Г. М. Поповым (в центре)..jpg
- File:Memorial plaque for Russian ballet dancer Yekaterina Geltzer in Bryusov pereulok, Moscow.jpg
- File:Nina Niss-Goldman.jpg
- File:Portrait of Valery Bryusov by Nina Niss-Goldman.jpg
- File:Portrait of Nina Niss-Goldman by Boris Karafelov.jpg
Yours sincerely, Sealle (talk) 05:17, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Last Address Sign —selo Karievo. Sovetskaia ul. 19. Perm.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Last Address Sign —selo Karievo. Sovetskaia ul. 19. Perm.png]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Dogad75 (talk) 18:59, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Last Address Sign - Perm, Ul. Dostoevskogo, 1 (2018-07-02) 03.png
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Last Address Sign - Perm, Ul. Dostoevskogo, 1 (2018-07-02) 03.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Majora (talk) 20:56, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Last Address - Saint Petersburg, Tchaikovsky Street, 63 (2018-12-02) has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. |
Brateevsky {talk} 11:51, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
Community Insights Survey
[edit]Share your experience in this survey
Hi Wavepainter,
The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 01:14, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Reminder: Community Insights Survey
[edit]Share your experience in this survey
Hi Wavepainter,
A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 15:23, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Reminder: Community Insights Survey
[edit]Share your experience in this survey
Hi Wavepainter,
There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Oleg Sentsov, Action Support. Munich, Germany. 2018-06-03. 02.jpg
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Oleg Sentsov, Action Support. Munich, Germany. 2018-06-03. 02.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
BevinKacon (talk) 12:01, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
Добрый день! Вопрос касается этого и ряда других загруженных вами файлов. Пожалуйста, в таких случаях при загрузке сразу после шаблона лицензии размещайте шаблон {{LicenseReview}} - указание лицензии на внешнем ресурсе требует проверки администратором или проверяющим. Эта процедура важна в том числе для загружающего - в случае, если ссылка перестанет быть активной, такая проверка убережет файл от удаления. И в данном случае как раз вопрос к вам - где именно на указанной вами странице находится текст о лицензировании? Я его поиском не нашёл, если это где-то глубоко на странице - хотя бы укажите дату, но вообще - это не самый лучший способ подтверждения, в отличие от OTRS. Если для проверки нужно иметь аккаунт в какой-то соцсети и долго искать там указанное разрешение - это может однажды закончиться отказом в подтверждении. --VLu (talk) 13:39, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- Таких файлов - 22. Если в фейсбуке подтверждения всё же нет, готовьте подтверждение через OTRS, иначе все придется отправлять на удаление. --VLu (talk) 22:30, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- VLu И Вам День добрый! Я сделал скриншоты, где всё видно и можно проверить. Куда я могу это прислать или как-то иначе, чтобы и на будущее? В принципе, я всегда мог бы делать скриншот и держать на случай, если понадобится. Спасибо. Wavepainter (talk) 14:25, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
- Насколько я знаю, агенты ОТРС работают только с правообладателями напрямую и не принимают копии, сканы и пересланные письма. Автор или правообладатель должен отправить туда письмо с адреса, который он сможет подтвердить на одном из безусловно принадлежащих ему ресурсов. Ещё вариант - подошёл бы не зависимый от вас архиватор - web.archive.com. Если в этом архиве есть ссылка на версию источника, где сохранилось разрешение, этого хватит. Нет - дергайте правообладателя. --VLu (talk) 15:03, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
- VLu Вы выше написали "Если в фейсбуке подтверждения всё же нет", на что я Вам ответил, что подтверждения есть, и сделал скриншоты, по которым их можно сразу найти. Их можно найти и без скриншотов, если страницы авторов скролить до 21 марта. Спасибо. Wavepainter (talk) 15:28, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
- Стоило хотя бы догадаться опубликовать разрешение так, чтобы оно не пряталось под катом "ЕЩЁ". --VLu (talk) 17:49, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
- VLu Уважаемый коллега, я свои действия строю не на догадках, а на полученных инструкциях – мне было сказано, что фразу «Текст и фотографии доступны по лицензии CC BY 4.0.» следует добавлять в конце текста перед фотографиями – я это скрупулёзно выполняю уже много лет. Как Вы можете убедиться, у меня загружено 2714 файлов и до сих пор у проверяющих наличие лицензии или ссылки на неё проблем не возникало, даже если эта ссылка попадала под See more… Надеюсь, что в будущем и у Вас таких проблем не возникнет. Поскольку, как я понимаю, Вы уже нашли все необходимые ссылки на лицензию CC BY 4.0, пожалуйста, не сочтите за труд удалить шаблоны с предупреждениями об удалении файлов. С уважением, Wavepainter (talk)
- Какие шаблоны? На удаление вынесены только файлы, для которых недостаточно разрешения фотографа, и это было указано выше. VLu (talk) 15:34, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
- VLu Коллега, Вы писали о 22-х файлах, на которые Вы не могли найти лицензии. Сейчас все лицензии найдены, в том числе и на файл, под которым у нас происходит вся эта переписка. Я посчитал, что вопрос закрыт и просил Вас удалить шаблон ниже, поскольку в числе 22 файлов есть и оригиналы тех, что Вы причислили к производным работам от несвободных фотографий. Теперь эти фотографии свободны, поскольку все лицензии Вами благополучно найдены. Wavepainter (talk) 16:37, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
- Давайте я напишу в третий раз - по производным работам (2 файла) вы никаких пояснений не предоставили: владельцы аккаунтов на FB не вправе определять лицензионный статус оригинальных работ, присутствующих на фото, поскольку не являются их авторами. --VLu (talk) 16:41, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
- Оригиналы двух файлов, что Вы номинировали на удаление, находятся в том же альбоме, где и все остальные Вами найденные. Один в альбоме на 6-м месте, а второй на 15-м. Wavepainter (talk) 00:04, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Такой файл - производная работа от несвободных фотографий (правило COM:DW/ru). Согласия автора современного фото недостаточно, нужны пояснения относительно статуса изображенных оригиналов. --VLu (talk) 13:52, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- Скажите - вы не понимаете того, что написано строкой выше, или умышленно пытаетесь ввести в заблуждение удалившего администратора? --VLu (talk) 11:29, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
- Попробую на пальцах, если с пониманием простых вещей и чтением основных правил у вас возникают какие-то сложности. Если вы (или кто-то другой, кто дает вам разрешение) фотографирует природу, людей, улицу, окно и тому подобное, такой фотограф вправе самостоятельно определять судьбу получившихся фотографий. Если этот же фотограф снимает чьи-то чужие работы – скульптуры, картины, плакаты, фотографии (как в вашем случае) – его собственного решения размещать получившиеся фотографии под свободной лицензией недостаточно, нужно получить разрешение на такое размещение автора тех самых скульптур, картин, плакатов и фотографий. Если вы не увидели этого в тексте правила, на которое получили уже несколько ссылок, или так и не поняли после этого последнего разъяснения, дайте знать, возможно, у меня появится идея, как еще понятнее перевести это с русского на русский. VLu (talk) 11:36, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, VLu (talk) 22:18, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
OTRS Verified account
[edit]Вопрос
[edit]Здравствуйте! Нет ли у вас фотографий Валерии Новодворской? Может быть, у вас есть знакомые, у кого есть такие фото? -- 2A00:1370:810C:62DC:D1FC:DE49:99AE:A7AA 14:52, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
- К сожалению, у меня нет, но я спрошу у знакомых. Всего доброгоǃ Wavepainter (talk) 17:03, 28 January 2021 (UTC)